Its Incumbent On All Consumers To Pay Attention
Jerry Phillips, a biochemist and director of the Excel Science Center at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs, devoted about a decade to examining cell phone radiation during his career and conducted some of the earliest studies on the potential health impacts of cell phones, he said.
Regarding the new National Toxicology Program reports, this keeps adding to the body of evidence that says you really have to be a little careful when we start talking about human safety and exposure to radio-frequency fields, said Phillips, who was not involved in the reports.
The early research Phillips conducted, as a scientist previously with the US Department of Veterans Affairs Pettis VA Medical Center in California, was funded by the telecommunications company Motorola, he said.
What About Cordless Phones
Cordless phones, commonly used in homes, have base units that are plugged into telephone jacks and wired to a local telephone service. They are not considered cell phones. Cordless phones operate at about 1/600 the power of cell phones, so they are much less likely to be a concern in terms of health effects.
How Are Millimeter Waves Different From Microwaves In Terms Of How They Affect Our Bodies And The Environment
Millimeter wave radiation is largely absorbed in the skin, the sweat glands, the peripheral nerves, the eyes and the testes, based upon the body of research thats been done on millimeter waves. In addition, this radiation may cause hypersensitivity and biochemical alterations in the immune and circulatory systems the heart, the liver, kidneys and brain.
Millimeter waves can also harm insects and promote the growth of drug-resistant pathogens, so its likely to have some widespread environmental effects for the microenvironments around these cell antenna sites.
Read Also: New Prostate Cancer Treatment In Germany
Q: What About Children And Cell Phones
A: Cell phones are not safe for children because they are more vulnerable. On July 12, 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission urging the FCC to open a formal inquiry into radiation standards for cell phones and other wireless products because children are more vulnerable to wireless radiation. They state that The FCC has not assessed the standards for cell phone radiation since 1996 and children are disproportionately impacted by all environmental exposures, including cell phone radiation
Current standards were not developed with childrens vulnerabilities in mind. Federal standards are based on an adult male model. Keeping wireless devices close to the pregnant abdomen is potentially dangerous because the developing fetus is especially susceptible to radiation. This is why many doctors and obstetricians recommend reducing cell phone and wireless exposures for pregnant women. See the BabySafe Project.
Keep in mind that the brain does not complete development until the mid-twenties. This means children deserve an additional level of precaution. Small insults on the developing brain can result in large impacts later in life. Their skulls are softer and thinner than an adults skull, and they also have more fluid content than an adult. The radiation is absorbed more deeply into childrens brains and therefore, children need greater protections in place.
How Can I Lower My Exposure To Rf Waves From Cell Phones
It is not clear at this time that RF waves from cell phones cause harmful health effects in people, but studies now being done should give a clearer picture of the possible health effects in the future. Until more is known, there are several things that people who are concerned about RF waves can do to limit their exposure.
Use the speaker mode or video chat feature on the phone, or a hands-free device such as a corded or cordless earpiece. This moves the antenna away from your head, which decreases the amount of RF waves that reach the head. Corded earpieces emit virtually no RF waves . Bluetooth® earpieces typically transmit RF waves at much lower power levels than cell phones themselves .
Texting instead of talking on the phone may be another way to reduce your exposure. But it may not be a good option in some situations, especially if you are driving. For safety reasons, it is especially important to limit or avoid the use of cell phones while driving.
Limit your cell phone use. This is one of the most obvious ways to limit your exposure to RF waves from cell phones. For example, you may want to limit the amount of time you spend talking on the phone . Parents who are concerned about their childrens exposure can limit how much time they spend talking on the phone.
You May Like: Cancer In The Bone Marrow
What Do Expert Agencies Say
The American Cancer Society does not have any official position or statement on whether or not radiofrequency radiation from cell phones, cell phone towers, or other sources is a cause of cancer. ACS generally looks to other expert organizations to determine if something causes cancer , including:
- The International Agency for Research on Cancer , which is part of the World Health Organization
- The US National Toxicology Program , which is formed from parts of several different government agencies, including the National Institutes of Health , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , and the Food and Drug Administration
Other major organizations also sometimes comment on the ability of certain exposures to cause cancer.
Based on a review of studies published up until 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified RF radiation as possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on limited evidence of a possible increase in risk for brain tumors among cell phone users, and inadequate evidence for other types of cancer.
More recently, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a technical report based on studies published between 2008 and 2018, as well as national trends in cancer rates. The report concluded: Based on the studies that are described in detail in this report, there is insufficient evidence to support a causal association between radiofrequency radiation exposure and .
According to the US Federal Communications Commission :
French Study Published In 2002
This study did not look specifically at cancer, but I thought the findings were applicable. This was a survey questionnaire study where they asked 530 people a series of questions. They found that more people complained of tiredness, headache, sleep disturbance, discomfort, irritability, depression, loss of memory, dizziness, libido decrease, etc. when they lived closer to cell towers and women significantly more often than men.
Their target distance from cell towers in this study was 300 meters. And they found an increase in symptoms the closer people lived to the cell towers. This study is entitled Investigation on the health of people living near mobile telephone relay stations: I/Incidence according to distance and sex.
Recommended Reading: Chemo Drugs For Ovarian Cancer
Smartphones With The Highest Levels Of Radiation Emissions
The Motorola Edge has the highest radiation emission with a SAR value of 1.79 watts of radiation per kilogram. Thats significantly higher than most other smartphone models in the market today and close to the limits set by the EU for cellphones.
Coming in second is the Axon 11 5G by ZTE with 1.59, followed by the OnePlus 6T at a close third with 1.55 W/kg. The Sony Experia AX2 Plus with 1.41 and the Google Pixel 3 XL and 3A XL at 1.39 round out the top five.
Here is a look at the 10 smartphones that emit the highest level of radiation:
Now that we have detailed the worst offenders lets look at the smartphones with the lowest levels of radiation emissions.
What Do Studies Show
Researchers use 2 main types of studies to try to determine if something might cause cancer:
- Studies done in the lab
- Studies looking at groups of people
In most cases neither type of study provides enough evidence on its own to show if something causes cancer in people, so researchers usually look at both lab-based and human studies.
The following is a brief summary of some of the major studies that have looked at this issue to date. However, this is not acomprehensive review of all studies that have been done.
You May Like: Pain Radiating From Hip Down Leg
I First Heard You Speak About The Health Risks Of Cellphone Radiation At Berkeley In 2019 But Youve Been Doing This Research Since 2009 What Led You To Pursue This Research
I got into this field by accident, actually. During the past 40 years, the bulk of my research has been focused on tobacco-related disease prevention. I first became interested in cellphone radiation in 2008, when Dr. Seung-Kwon Myung, a physician scientist with the National Cancer Center of South Korea, came to spend a year at the Center for Family and Community Health. He was involved in our smoking cessation projects, and we worked with him and his colleagues on two reviews of the literature, one of which addressed the tumor risk from cellphone use.
At that time, I was skeptical that cellphone radiation could be harmful. However, since I was dubious that cellphone radiation could cause cancer, I immersed myself in the literature regarding the biological effects of low-intensity microwave radiation, emitted by cellphones and other wireless devices.
After reading many animal toxicology studies that found that this radiation could increase oxidative stress free radicals, stress proteins and DNA damage I became increasingly convinced that what we were observing in our review of human studies was indeed a real risk.
Q: How Did Cell Phones Get On The Market With So Many Problems
A: In short, the industry was given a free pass decades ago that allow the exclusion of devices that emitted low levels of microwave radiation from proper safety testing. Cell phones and wireless devices are not safety tested like new drugs or medical devices are coming on the market. If a cell phone would have been tested like a drug, it would be taken off the market by now.
Several books have been written on the subject. Click here to see Dr. Devra Daviss book Disconnect that details how the wireless industry wargamed the science.Click here to hear the history from expert scientist Dr. George Carlo of how the industry was able to get this technology to market before it was properly tested and how research findings have been suppressed since. His book Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in a Wireless Age details industry corruption and how research has been suppressed. Dr. Carlo chaired $28 million dollars in research with the wireless industry. When his research found troubling effects, the wireless industry treated it like a public relations problem rather than a public health problem.
You May Like: Targeted Therapy For Breast Cancer
It Reminds Me Of When The Us Surgeon General Released A Landmark Report In 1964 That Linked Cigarettes With Dangerous Health Effects Including Cancer And Heart Disease Even Though The 10
Yes, there are strong parallels between what the telecom industry has done and what the tobacco industry has done, in terms of marketing and controlling messaging to the public. In the 1940s, tobacco companies hired doctors and dentists to endorse their products to reduce public health concerns about smoking risks. The CTIA currently uses a nuclear physicist from academia to assure policymakers that microwave radiation is safe. The telecom industry not only uses the tobacco industry playbook, it is more economically and politically powerful than Big Tobacco ever was. This year, the telecom industry will spend over $18 billion advertising cellular technology worldwide.
Q: The Majority Of Industry
A: With 87% of brain activity studies sponsored by the mobile phone industry, the issue of conflicts of interest cannot be ignored. The majority of telecom industry-sponsored research studies show no adverse effect and the majority of non-industry sponsored studies do show an adverse effect. Systematic reviews of the influence of financial interests in medical research have found strong associations between industry sponsorship and pro-industry conclusions . Significant sponsorship and publication biases have been specifically noted in EMF research .
We examined the methodologic quality and results of experimental studies investigating the effects of the type of radiofrequency radiation emitted by handheld cellular telephones. We hypothesized that studies would be less likely to show an effect of the exposure if funded by the telecommunications industry, which has a vested interest in portraying the use of mobile phones as safe. We found that the studies funded exclusively by industry were indeed substantially less likely to report statistically significant effects on a range of endpoints that may be relevant to health.
Conclusions: The interpretation of results from studies of health effects of radiofrequency radiation should take sponsorship into account.
For more expert analysis on industry influence into cell phone science please go here.
Also Check: Why Does Cancer Come Back
Q: What Other Devices Besides Cell Phones Emit This Type Of Radiation
A: All devices that are wirelessly enabled will emit microwave radiation when the networks settings are on. These include DECT home cordless phones, the cordless home phone base, cordless baby monitors, Wi-Fi routers, wireless computers, gaming devices, iPads and tablets, wireless speakers, iPods that connect to the internet and even Fitbit.
If a device is wireless including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth), it is a two-way microwave radio and has microwave radiofrequency emissions. In the world we live in now people are exposed to microwave radiation from multiple devices in their home, school, and work every day. Federal regulations were developed decades ago before such scenarios could even be imagined. This is why we recommend reducing exposures and swapping out wireless with safe corded and wired connections whenever possible.
There is currently a huge push from school boards and local governments to make elementary schools entirely wireless. EHT has developed resources specifically on the issueof wireless exposures in schools.
The Non Scientific Other Side Ie Main Stream Sources
It seems that government, government funded, tech industry and tech industry funded sources are the ones that always claim that all forms of EMF Radiation are safe. I only use CNNs logo here because they have become the standard in bought and paid for biased propaganda . I cant even dignify CNN by calling their drivel news. But I digress. Let me give you a few examples of articles and claims from these types of sources, and then I will give you my thoughts at the end of this section.
Recommended Reading: Best Gummies For Chemo Nausea
How Is Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure Measured In Studies Of Groups Of People
Epidemiologic studies use information from several sources, including questionnaires and data from cell phone service providers, to estimate radiofrequency radiation exposure in groups of people. Direct measurements are not yet possible outside of a laboratory setting. Estimates from studies reported to date take into account the following:
- How regularly study participants use cell phones
- The age and the year when study participants first used a cell phone and the age and the year of last use
- The average number of cell phone calls per day, week, or month
- The average length of a typical cell phone call
- The total hours of lifetime use, calculated from the length of typical call times, the frequency of use, and the duration of use
Different Generations Of Wireless Technology And Future Plans
Q: How do the exposures relate to WiFi? A: NTP did not study the frequencies and modulations used for WiFi.
Q: Are there additional studies planned by NTP? A: NTP is collaborating with the National Institute of Standards and Technology on short-term exposure studies in smaller RFR exposure chambers. These studies will focus on further clarifying what NTP learned in the long-term studies and investigating the possibility of DNA damage in exposed tissues. Additionally, the new chambers have increased flexibility with respect to exposure scenarios and increased signal generating capabilities, which will allow NTP to test different modulations and frequencies. Follow-up studies will begin in Fall 2020.
Q: How else will the new chambers be used? A: After verifying that the new, smaller chambers are working properly, NTP scientists want to confirm the effect that they saw on DNA damage in their earlier studies is in these follow-up experiments and further characterize effects on DNA. This will give scientists more confidence in the results of the initial studies, as reproducibility is an important concept in any scientific study, especially one as complex as studying RFR.
Recommended Reading: When Does Hair Start Growing Back After Chemo
Microwave Expert & Physicist Barry Trower
Barry Trower, a British physicist who spent his whole career working with and studying this radiation, gives us his expert opinion. In the below video he discusses all of the harmful health effects he witnessed personally caused by this radiation.
Barry Trower has also given a lot of interviews on the harm that will be caused by the roll out of 5G technologies. You can find some of his interviews on this topic on the scientific studies page of this website.
Q: Is Anyone Doing Anything About It
Berkeley California has passed a cell phone right to know ordinance informing people about the radiation emissions from their phones. Several cities have passed proclamations on cell phone radiation.
Although the FCC is moving full steam ahead with 5G, US states are starting to recognize the lack of accountability. Oregon passed a bill, SB283, which directs the Oregon Health Authority to review peer-reviewed, independently funded scientific studies of health effects of exposure to microwave radiation, particularly exposure that results from use of wireless network technologies in schools.
New Hampshire passed HB 522 An act establishing a commission to study the environmental and health effects of evolving 5G technology which created an expert Commission to study the health and environmental impacts of 5G.
Over 20 countries have policies in place to educate the public on reducing cell phone radiation. Russia, the UK, Canada, and many other countries discourage the use of cell phones by children, and France and Belgium have actually banned the sale of phones to children. Toronto, Canada limits Wi-Fi in public parks. Several local governments ban cell towers on schools or near hospitals. Please see our web page on policy to read the full list.
Recommended Reading: Icd10 History Of Breast Cancer